Given the multifaceted character of corporate social responsibility and the range of policies adopted by companies, European regulations afford member states a degree of flexibility in enacting policies to embrace sustainability practices. The frequency and manner in which companies communicate their goals and accomplishments is heterogeneous across EU countries.
In the Italian context, there exist currently minimal legal obligations for divulging information concerning environmental impacts, health, safety, utilization of renewable energy resources, gas emissions, pollution, and other social factors. Italian No. 254/2016, transposing European Directive 2014/95/EU, imposes requirements for non-financial reporting and strives to monitor the commitment of states to sustainable development. This reporting is effectively mandatory for two entities:
- Public interest entities: organizations, institutions, or companies that wield a substantial role in the broader societal interest, boasting over five hundred employees surpassing at least one of the subsequent size thresholds at the conclusion of the balance sheet: a) total assets on the statement of financial position exceeding 20 million euros; b) total net sales and services revenues exceeding 40 million euros
- Parent companies: holdings, employing a workforce of more than five hundred and presenting a consolidated financial statement meeting at least one of the following criteria: a) total assets on the statement of financial position greater than 20 million euros; b) total net sales and services revenues exceeding 40 million euros
The Italian government has underscored the significance of sustainability within businesses. This is evident, for instance, in the Economy and Finance document, where indicators of well-being and sustainability are incorporated alongside traditional metrics like GDP, employment, and public debt.
However, there is divergence among companies in their interpretations of sustainability. Some view it as a constraint, responding only through adherence to voluntary standards, while others see it as an opportunity, leveraging it for competitive advantage and differentiation. The motivation to embrace sustainability may derive from a vision linked to environmental respect, business objectives, or a blend of both.
Sustainability demands a considerable investment of energy by the company, yet it brings forth advantages:
- Motivation and engagement of employees: they are prouder and more involved when working for a sustainable company with goals beyond economic objectives
- Enhancement of reputation and credibility: sustainable companies generally enjoy a more favorable image among the public
- Boost in sales and loyalty of stakeholders, especially consumers
- Better relations with the community
- Improved relations with the community
- Upturn in economic performance
- Utilizing waste as raw materials achieves a diminished environmental impact by making use of existing materials, thereby easing the burden of waste disposal
- Better relations with financiers who are increasingly attentive to the sustainable conduct of the companies in which they invest
The optimal solution is to seek a socio-economic synthesis, a "win-win" scenario where benefits are obtained on both the economic and social fronts. External pressures, such as public opinion and social movements, drive towards this convergence. To achieve an effective solution, it is necessary to balance economic and social objectives so that each sustainability project or initiative leads to improvements in both sectors.